A polar low formed over the open waters of Ungava Bay early on
02 December 2000 with winds gusting up to 40 kts at some coastal
observing stations. It took only a few hours for the low to form
and it lasted around 20 hours. As the low slowly drifted eastward,
it decayed into an area of convection over the Torngat Mountains
and the Labrador Sea.
The polar low formed as a consequence of the superimposition
of upper-level conditions with favourable surface conditions.
Very cold air at upper and low levels, together with an area of
positive vorticity advection, interacted with a low-level baroclinic
zone. The baroclinic zone set up as a result of the ice/water
boundary near the western shore of Ungava Bay. The open water
provided large amounts of latent and sensible heating to the boundary
layer, resulting in an unstable thermal profile through a deep
layer of the atmosphere. The resulting polar low moved across
the Bay and eventually dissipated as surface and upper-level conditions
became less favourable.
Note: This Summary provides an overview of the
formation, evolution, and decay of the polar
low. The Case Challenge provides a more in-depth analysis. Additional
information on polar lows is referenced in the Supporting
Topics.
At 0000 UTC on 01 December the analysis indicates a 500-hPa trough
lying over Foxe Basin and northern Hudson Bay. A well-defined
vorticity center lies just south of Southampton Island, with an
associated region of PVA to its east and south. Temperatures in
the trough are very cold, near -40°C.
Upper-level Precursors (cont.)
The area of vorticity advection is well-correlated to a band
of clouds composed of cirrus or thin mid-level clouds, as shown
on the NOAA-14 IR imagery from 2050 UTC on 30 November.
no
place names view
place names
Lower-level Precursors
Polar lows often form due to the interaction of a suitable
upper-level pattern with favourable low-level and surface conditions.
Typically, these low-level conditions consist of outbreaks of
cold air across ice-water boundaries and their associated low-level
baroclinic zones (see 1.1.1
Sensible and Latent Heat and 1.1.2
Baroclinic Instability).
At 0000 UTC on 01 December, the surface chart shows a trough
of low pressure over Foxe Basin and northern Hudson Bay. Observed
temperatures are at or below -25°C west of the trough. To
the east, over the Quebec coast of Hudson Bay, temperatures are
higher. These conditions point to a cold-air outbreak behind the
trough.
Lower-level Precursors (cont.)
The ice analysis
chart for this time period shows Ungava Bay to be nearly ice
free, though there is a narrow band of 9/10ths ice cover along
its western and southern shores. The ice-water boundary creates
a local, shallow baroclinic zone. This is enhanced at 925 hPa
and 850 hPa by similarly-oriented baroclinic zones created by
the cold low-level air flowing eastward over the Bay.
In this case, the upper-level and surface troughs are moving
eastward together and arrive near the western shore of Ungava
Bay shortly before 0000 UTC on 02 December. At that time, the
upper pattern is still favourable as a polar low precursor and
the area of positive vorticity advection remains well-defined.
Triggers and Development: Verification
This satellite imagery shows the cloud pattern associated with
the upper trough and vorticity advection as it moves eastward
over Ungava Bay. Surface observations indicate the passage of
the low-level trough between 1800 and 0000 UTC on 01-02 December
with the associated westerly winds and cold advection to the west
of the trough. From the NOAA-12 IR 2211 UTC satellite imagery,
it is clear that cloud streamers are forming over the open water
of western Ungava Bay in the cold westerly flow following the
passage of the trough.
Triggers and Development: Upper- and Lower-level Interaction
The interaction of certain upper- and lower-level patterns is
thought to be important for polar low development and can be examined
in a number of ways. One method is the potential vorticity (PV)
approach. PV can be used to schematically illustrate how upper-level
baroclinicity can reach down in the atmosphere to link up with
low-level baroclinicity. In the case of a polar low, the diabatic
heating of the cold atmosphere by open water plays a key role.
Over southwestern Ungava Bay, the GEM regional 6-hour forecast
from 0000 UTC on 02 December defines fluxes of up to 600 watts/m2 leading to diabatic heating in the lower layers of the atmosphere.
Triggers and Development: Upper- and Lower-level Interaction
(cont.)
This cross section over Ungava Bay shows PV for the same 6-hour
forecast. The 1.2 PVU contour extends downward to around 800
hPa, while another small 1.2 PVU contour is found from about
1000 to 900 hPa over Ungava Bay. This low-level PV max is likely
related to the diabatic heating in that area. The 1.2 PVU contour
symbolically connects the upper and lower PV maxima. The interaction
between upper and lower PV maxima is one way to consider the
relationship between upper and lower levels in the polar low
development process.
Appearance in Satellite Imagery
Polar lows form in high-latitude areas over oceans or other
bodies of water. These are generally data sparse areas, making
satellite
imagery the primary method of detecting polar lows. Images
from polar orbiters are commonly used, while those from
geostationary satellites can be used if the low is not too far
north. (see 3.1.4
Satellite Imagery Characteristics and 3.2
Use of Satellite Imagery)
By 0515 UTC, the GOES IR imagery shows the old comma cloud rapidly
spinning up and beginning to form a more distinct spiral-shape
over Ungava Bay. At the height of its development, around 0900
UTC, the polar low has a classic shape with spiral arms whose
individual elements have well-defined edges typical of convective
cloud.
Surface and Upper-air Observations
Due to their remote location, the forecaster will be lucky to
get a ship, buoy, or coastal land station observation close to
a polar low. This calls for careful monitoring of all available
surface observations for subtle signs involving pressure or wind
speed and direction. (See
3.1 Nowcasting )
The GEM Regional surface analysis
for 1200 UTC on 02 December does not resolve the polar low. Its
MSL pressure is about 1008 hPa at
WKW, and
1007 at WRH. The automated analysis shows only an open trough
between those two stations, with pressures no lower than 1005
hPa in the trough. In reality, pressure at WKW is 1005 hPa, 3
hPa deeper than the initialization. The observed pressure at
WRH
is 1008 hPa. The gradient between the stations is tighter than
shown by the initialization. In addition, observed winds at
WRH
are westerly, indicating a closed low rather than the open trough
of the initialization.
It is very unusual to have a radiosonde observation in the vicinity
of a polar low. However, in this case, the station YVP, on the
south shore of Ungava Bay, did provide soundings representative
of the conditions over Ungava Bay during the development of the
polar low. The sounding from this site at 1200 UTC on 02 December
illustrates the vertical structure of the very cold air mass in
the area. The temperatures between 600 and 500 hPa are near -40ºC,
and the lowest level air is at around -18ºC. This air mass,
when placed over the open water of Ungava Bay, will exhibit a
great deal of instability through a deep atmospheric layer.
It is important to realize the limitations of the NWP guidance.
In December 2000, the horizontal resolution of the GEM regional
model was 24 km. Since at least 8 grid points are required to
define a feature in an NWP model if it is to be well-forecast,
wavelike structures with a scale of around 200 km, the approximate
size of Ungava Bay, are at the limit of the model's ability. (See
A 20 km Grid Accurately Depicts 40 km Features in the Ten
Common NWP Misconceptions series for more discussion of this
point).
NWP models depend on accurate initial
analyses, but the high-latitude areas in which polar lows form
are generally data-sparse areas in terms of traditional observational
data. This means that model trial fields (first-guess fields)
can be inadequate in these areas. Satellite data have barely
started to fill the data void. For these reasons, the initial
analysis of a NWP model can be incorrect on the details of
position and depth of a small-scale high-latitude feature such
as a polar low.
Another potential analysis problem is with the ice coverage
used by the model. Ice analyses may be done on relatively coarse
grids, so features such as ice-water boundaries can be "smeared
out," even if there are adequate ice observations. During
the polar low event, there is a discrepancy between the amount
of ice coverage used by the GEM Regional model versus the coverage
as interpreted by the Canadian Ice Service. Since the latter
is based more closely on actual observations, it is considered
a more accurate representation. Compare the GEM Regional analysis
for the following 00-hour forecasts to the Canadian
Ice Service product.
As noted earlier, the Ungava Bay polar low dissipated as it
crossed over the Torngat Mountains. By 1800 UTC, as the polar
low moves eastward with the 500 hPa trough, it loses its shape
and definition as it makes landfall on the east side of Ungava
Bay. It then dissipates over the land of the Torngat mountains.
The upper support also moved across the Torngats to the Labrador
Sea, where a rather
disorganized cyclonic surface pattern formed. The polar low
did not reestablish itself over the Labrador Sea. Rather, the
cyclonic pattern
is
best
considered
as
a new and weaker system to the lee of the Torngats.